Keep Momma Malina in her Home

Aimee and I saw a couple Living Theatre-related events this week. First we went to an evening celebrating the release of Judith Malina’s book The Piscator Notebook. It is always amazing to hear her talk. This event had a little something extra because it took place in the same room where she learned from Erwin Piscator.

We went last night to see the new print of The Connection at the IFC Center. It was astounding to see this. I’d never seen it previously and found myself time and again imagining the ripples this play must have made when it was first performed.

The Living Theatre has made contributions to the theatre that continue to impact the work done today. And, in fact, the Living Theatre and Judith Malina, now aged 85, continue to create theatre. As Brad Burgess, the Living Theatre’s executive producer, has said, she is the mother of Off Broadway.

For those who don’t know about the struggle the Living Theatre has had please read this article from the Village Voice. She is a member of the Theatre Hall of Fame. In some ways, she has outlived her legend but continues to do her work. Members of the theater community should support her. One day, one of us might be so lucky to live so long and to keep pursuing our passions.

They only have one more day in their fund drive. Please give generously at the link below and spread the word.

http://www.luckyant.com/livingtheatre

The 4 Actual Types of New York City Theater

I have been thinking about these categories for many months now. I believe they cover all the variations one can find in New York City today. It is time to end the old way of things. Broadway, off-Broadway, and off-off Broadway designations do not do justice to what is really happening. To many, these classifications represent quality. In reality, they do not. Also, they do not represent where they are geographically. If this were true, the United Palace in Washington Heights would be a Broadway theater. Technically, they signify the number of seats in a theater. off-off is 99 seats and below. Off-Broadway is 100 to 499. Broadway is 500 seats and above.

I call for these 4 types of theater to be used when defining the type of theater you are seeing.

1. Destination Theater. Originally, I wanted to name this Tourist Trap Theater. I decided that was too harsh. If this name is to stick it should have something positive about it. (Of course, one could argue “off-off” has a negative connotation but that moniker has stuck for more than five decades so what do I know.) Destination Theater is made with big budgets and has some element most people know already. It has a name involved many people coming to the city would already know or the material is familiar. On the positive side, it brings needed money to the city.

2. Hometown Theater. There is a certain civic pride to theater made in NYC. It is for New Yorkers by New Yorkers. The local heroes involved in these projects carry a stamp of approval. People seek out this type of theater because their friends and other people they know whose opinions they respect will go to see it. (Note: New Yorker as defined here is anyone who has lived here long enough to self-identify as a New Yorker.)

3. Artisanal Theater. Usually vetted outside the city and imported in, this type of theater is pricey. People go to see this because certain publications have given their approval of it. Standing in the lobby at intermission, you can frequently hear patrons say they have no idea what is going on. I don’t know if this is because the patrons usually spend their time thinking about other things or because they have so much money they do not care whether they understand something or not. They know so-and-so from such-and-such said it was good so it must be good.

4. Indie Theater. Made by the artists. Usually for budgets less (often way less) than $30,000. They mostly have runs of under three weeks because of rules in place by Actors’ Equity and because tickets sales will never pay for the production, even if each night is sold out. It is the bedrock of New York City theater. People go to see this because they know one of the artists involved, want to work with one of the artists involved, or have slept with or would like to sleep with one of the artists involved. Or they would like to see one of the artists involved fail. The audiences usually are either overly-friendly or very guarded.

5. Added category. (I don’t know if this should actually count. Therefore, it’s not lumped in with the big four.) Bad theater. There is a lot of bad theater in New York City. There is more theater in New York City and more than its fair share of bad theater.

I believe this covers it. There are variations. Sometimes a piece of theater might go under more than one category and, yes, there could be sub-categories. But I think the main factors for categorization are money and approval. The amount of money spent on a production and who approves the work really determine the actual type of theater that is being made.

Pictured above, a Destination Theater on 41st Street in New York City getting prepared for a musical, produced by Disney and based on a movie, to begin its run.

Go To Rabbit Island

Rabbit Island, is in the Frigid Festival on Thurs, Feb. 23 at 9 p.m., Sat, Feb. 25 at 8:30 p.m., Mon, Feb. 27 at 7:30 p.m., Thurs, March 1 at 6 p.m., and Sat, March 3 at 5:30 p.m. Tickets are $12 to $16. Click here for tickets. (Search “Rabbit Island”)

At the Kraine Theater, 85 East 4th Street. East Village, NYC.

Subway: F to Lower East Side–Second Ave, 6 to Bleecker Street

Running time: 60 minutes

Rabbit Island is named a MUST SEE by The Local: East Village Blog for The New York Times.

The playwright Chris Harcum is interviewed on The Happiest Medium.

Visible Soul interviews members of the Rabbit Island Creative Team:

Ethan Angelica


Laura Butler

Chris Harcum

Carrie Heitman

Mel House

Mariko Iwasa

Joel Nagle

Aimee Todoroff

Both Sides of the Desk

It has been educational running the auditions for Rabbit Island. I will always identify as an actor first. Even if I was stricken with ALS and couldn’t talk or move, I’d still see myself as an actor. Most of my closest friends are actors. I’ve had some of my most important and profoundly human experiences working or just being around actors. But being exposed to more of them, I can see why people aren’t so crazy about them. And why people had weird reactions to me when I’ve admitted to being an actor.

Usually, I either work as a solo performer or with people I know from previous projects. Aimee and I thought it would be prudent to post a notice for this play in a few places thinking we might hear from a hundred or so interested people. You can read the actual character breakdown in my last post. In a nutshell, we were looking for 5 actors to do a 60-minute play for 5 performances in the Frigid Festival. There would be about 70 hours of rehearsal and we are paying a $200 stipend for the rehearsals and run.

First, we sent emails to actors we know and think are good for this project. That was to maybe a dozen or so people. We only heard back from half. Why would you not even respond to a polite and complimentary email offering you a job, even if you aren’t interested or are too busy? Maybe the emails went to spam folders or they are dealing with something time consuming and difficult or maybe we aren’t on as good of terms with those actors as I thought. At every turn, I tried to think the better of why someone would flake or do something weird.

No matter, we pressed on. Aimee posted the breakdown on Actors First New York and Actors Access. From the former, we received 30 or so requests. From the latter, we had over 1600 submissions. Over 650 were for the female role who is in her late 20s to mid-30s. 400 plus were for the female who is mid-20s to early 30s. The two male roles only had 300 or so combined. The rest were for the any age/any type role. Even though some actresses submitted for 2 or even 3 roles, we still had over 1600.

How did we weed them down? Aimee took the first pass. She is the director so her say is weighted more than mine. After writing the play and trimming it down, my job is mostly to throw in my two cents now and then but to know when I’m getting too close to stepping over the line. I went through and pulled a few people but most of them were her picks. She looked at their work online. Photos, websites, reviews, videos, etc. People who did not present well online were not considered.

There were a couple submissions by people I know who are good but not right for this. It was good to see their faces pop up. Hopefully something else in the future will come together.

There were many, many people who were submitting just to submit. I will write about this now openly and honestly without too much fear of reprisal as my blog page views were barely above triple digits since the breakdown was posted. This says to me the actors were mostly reflex submitting and not doing any due diligence on the play or the people working on it. In all fairness, it is only a small downtown project. On the other hand, actors should be smarter and know what they are getting themselves involved in. Just put my name or Aimee’s name into a search engine and you’ll find all sorts of stuff about our work. Then ask yourself if you want to work with us. There are a lot of people out there who do good work but what they do isn’t a good fit for me.

It was not hard to skip over the crazy or those not serious about their craft out of the 1600. If a guy is pointing a gun into the lens of the camera for his profile pic, we will not call him or her in for an audition. If someone is using a picture in a bar, we will not call him or her in either. Mostly we had professional looking pictures and most actors had good to pretty great credits. These roles actually require actors with good training and serious comedic acting skills.

Most also did not have their email or cell numbers on their AA profile. This made it hard to reach to them. For a couple, it meant not being called in because it was too much trouble. If you have a website, have some way of reaching you on it. There isn’t much point of having a website if someone can’t reach you to offer you an audition from it.

A lot of people are putting notes with their submissions. Most were “I’m this kind of actor who has done this and this and this so I’d be great to play Karen.” This was well and good but usually didn’t put people over. I can read your training and credits and know what you can do. Much worse were the notes that read “Think of a blend of this actress and that actress.” I can’t begin to give two blended shits. Forge your own style and personality. Something about either of those gave me an uneasy feeling like this person would be kind of difficult. This kind of project will require the actors to roll up their sleeves and work. Those notes made me think they wouldn’t want to put in too much because there isn’t a guaranteed easy path to fame with this project. Everyone will be treated fairly and professionally and probably better than on most indie projects based on my personal experience but Wonka wrappers will not be handed out. Lots of respect and challenging work that should resonate with the audiences though.

The notes that did make me look closer at certain people were more geared towards the project. “This role sounds too much like me” or “this is intriguing” or “not sure what this is but it struck a chord with me.” Those notes tipped me that these are thoughtful people who might work more for the good of the project rather than making themselves look good. I write to give actors something to sink their teeth into as much as tell a good story. I think messages sent along these lines tipped me that this might be an actor who is responsive to good material and will do something with it by digging into it. These would not be people waiting for things to be told to them or grind the rehearsals to a stop so they can get over their fear enough to get into it.

If you date someone and then can’t bring yourself to speak to that person after a break-up, don’t submit yourself for a project they are working on. That is a crap-tastic way to try to make amends. Do that in real life first. I hope the economy improves soon so things like this don’t have to happen too often.

Getting the Karens down to the 6 we called in wasn’t easy. Other characters were easier. We had 25 to 30 we were going to see, which is more than plenty. Several did not show up on the day of the auditions due to illness, other conflicting jobs, or a rehearsal that was running long. It was also a really pretty day so it would be easy not to go to the audition. One person in the room admitted as much to me, saying she was thinking of not coming in but thought the sides were too good to pass up. I appreciated the candor slightly, mostly I was shocked she would say this. One guy couldn’t make it because of train malfunction and a rehearsal. He tried really hard it seemed from his emails and really was interested. We would keep him in mind for the future. The others were a little shady. To suddenly have a job in the winter on a Sunday morning in early October…shady. But I tried to think the best and dismissed it. I probably won’t call that actor for anything else though.

The people we called in were very prepared, though the people we didn’t know personally were slightly more prepared overall. The greater majority of the people we saw are people with whom we would want to work. Really at this point it’s about getting the right mix of people because it’s an ensemble piece. It was really tough but I decided not to play the role I wrote for myself. That’s how serious we are about this.